- software, multimedia (x)
- 2009-12 (x)
- Search results
Search results
Show moreHistorically, accountability research has focused on operational methodologies and financial structures and disclosures designed to advantageously position, legitimate and heighten the esteem in which the nonprofit organization is held by various stakeholders. Society, however, has become increasingly interested in transparency beyond structural and financial boundaries and is more concerned with emergent forms of accountability. Grounded in recent qualitative research, the present study develops and tests a measurable form of negotiated accountability and the role this type of accountability plays in linking organizational commitment and performance in a nonprofit context. A new second-order negotiated accountability construct consisting of six dimensions is identified and validated. The results demonstrate accountability can be measured in new ways. The findings advance current understanding and provide a foundation for future research into accountability mechanisms.
Show less
Show moreHow do boards make strategic decisions? Semi-structured interviews with twenty eight directors of small to medium size publicly traded U.S. companies in the high technology sector were conducted in order to gain insights into strategic decision-making at the board level. We identified six characteristics that distinguish two divergent views about strategic decision-making. These characteristics include the role of the board chair, the boardroom climate, the board’s shared vision and goals, the board’s agency primacy, the board’s process for decision closure and the board’s level of involvement in the strategic planning process.
Show less