- Browse Repository
- Case Western Reserve University Special Collections
- Kelvin Smith Library
- Charles F. Brush, Sr. Papers
- Charles F. Brush, Sr. Papers: Series 04: Litigation
Charles F. Brush, Sr. Papers: Series 04: Litigation
Show moreTyped court transcripts detailing examination of Charles F. Chandler between February 13, 1890 and May 24, 1890, in patent lawsuit Brush Electric Co. vs. Accumulator Co. Includes letters from Witter and Kenyon, Counselors at Law to Brush Electric Company in November 1890
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 10
Folder 5
Show less
Show moreTyped and handwritten letters between Witter and Kenyon, Counselors at Law, William Bolton, Brush Electric Company general counsel, and William Bracken, Consolidated Electric Storage Company, regarding events, strategies, and court decisions concerning the court case Brush Electric Company and Consolidated Electric Storage Company, et. al., vs. Accumulator Company, et. al., written between January 8, 1891 and December 22, 1891
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 10
Folder 6
Show less
Show moreTyped and handwritten correspondence between Witter and Kenyon, Counselors at Law, William Bolton, Brush Electric Company general counsel, and William Bracken of Consolidated Electric Storage Company regarding legal fees, and further events in of the court case Brush Electric Company and Consolidated Electric Storage Company, et. al., vs. Accumulator Company, et. al., written between January 3, 1893 and October 21, 1893.
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 11
Folder 2
Show less
Show moreTyped and handwritten correspondence between Witter and Kenyon, Counselors at Law, William Bolton, Brush Electric Company general counsel, and William Bracken of Consolidated Electric Storage Company regarding discontinuance of the court case Brush Electric Company and Consolidated Electric Storage Company vs. Electric Accumulator Company, written between January 2, 1894 and June 26, 1895
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 11
Folder 3
Show less
Show moreTyped and handwritten correspondence between Witter and Kenyon, Counselors at Law, William Bolton, Brush Electric Company general counsel, William Bracken and C. A. Coffin of Consolidated Electric Storage Company, John S. Bartlett and J. Kirby Jr. of Dayton Electric Manufacturing Company, and Pedro Salom regarding events, court decisions, and consequences of the court case Brush Electric Company and Consolidated Electric Storage Company, et. al., vs. Accumulator Company, et. al., and the appeal of that case, written between August 10, 1892 and December 29, 1892. Includes pamphlet detailing opinion of Judge Coxe in favor of Brush Electric Company from 1891, and pamphlet detailing decision of Circuit Court of Appeals in favor of Brush Electric Company in 1892
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 11
Folder 1
Show less
Show moreTyped and handwritten letters between Witter and Kenyon, Counselors at Law, William Bolton, Brush Electric Company general counsel, William Bracken, Consolidated Electric Storage Company, and Law Offices of Fish, Richardson and Storrow, regarding events, strategies, and court decisions concerning the court case Brush Electric Company and Consolidated Electric Storage Company, et. al., vs. Accumulator Company, et. al., and the appeal of that case, written between January 19, 1892 and May 27, 1892
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 10
Folder 7
Show less
Show moreTyped and handwritten correspondence between Witter and Kenyon, Counselors at Law, William Bolton, Brush Electric Company general counsel, William Bracken, Consolidated Electric Storage Company, and Law Offices of Fish, Richardson and Storrow, regarding events, strategies, and court decisions concerning the court case Brush Electric Company and Consolidated Electric Storage Company, et. al., vs. Accumulator Company, et. al., and the appeal of that case, written between June 1, 1892 and July 28, 1892
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 10
Folder 8
Show less
Show moreVarious typed official documents regarding agreements reached between complainants and defendants, and court decisions made during court case Brush Electric Company vs. Accumulator Company
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 11
Folder 4
Show less
Show moreVarious typed official documents regarding agreements reached between complainants and defendants, and court decisions made during court case Brush Electric Company vs. Accumulator Company, as well as several pamphlets detailing progress of the case
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 11
Folder 5
Show less
Show moreThree typed publications of litigation, from 1885, from the United States Patent Office case of Antony Shaw versus Charles F. Brush, written by Leggett and Leggett, H. A. Seymour, and A. Pollok, related to components of secondary batteries. Includes Testimony on Behalf of Charles F. Brush, Argument for Brush, and Argument for Shaw on Final Hearing
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 17
Folder 6
Show less
Show moreThree typed publications concerning litigation for Charles E. Tripler vs. Carl Linde, regarding an improved process and apparatus for producing oxygen by liquefying air. Tripler asserts that he invented and patented a specific method and machine before Linde. Includes Patent Office Brief for Linde by H. A. Seymour, Court of Appeals Brief on behalf of Appellee by H. A. Seymour, and Appeal from Examiner in Chief, F. I. Allen
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 9
Folder 9
Show less
Show moreTyped letters between William Bolton of Brush Electric Company and Gilbert Crawford of G.H. and F. L. Crawford, Attorneys and Counselors at Law, and several others, regarding matters pertaining to the court case Brush-Swan Electric Light Company vs. Brush Electric Company, particularly in how orders from customers of Brush-Swan Company should be filled now that relations between both companies were broken. Written between August 26, 1890 and December 24, 1891
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 11
Folder 6
Show less
Show moreTyped and handwritten letters between William Bolton of Brush Electric Company and Gilbert Crawford of G.H. and F. L. Crawford, Attorneys and Counselors at Law, and several others, regarding matters pertaining to the court case Brush-Swan Electric Light Company vs. Brush Electric Company. Written between January 19, 1892 and December 9, 1892
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 11
Folder 7
Show less
Show moreTyped and handwritten letters between William Bolton of Brush Electric Company and Gilbert Crawford of G.H. and F. L. Crawford, Attorneys and Counselors at Law, and several others, regarding matters pertaining to the court case Brush-Swan Electric Light Company vs. Brush Electric Company. Written between February 23, 1893 and May 24, 1893
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 12
Folder 1
Show less
Show moreTyped court transcripts regarding the case Brush-Swan Electric Light Company, of New England vs. The Brush Electric Company, taking place in 1890, 1891, 1892, and 1893
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 12
Folder 2
Show less
Show moreThree typed publications regarding the patent suit of Charles F. Brush, Sr. and the Brush Electric Company against C. Harrison Condit, Joseph Hanson and Abraham van Winkle, doing business as Condit, Hanson, and van Winkle, over patent issues related to the Brush arc light system, from years 1883, 1884. Includes two volumes of Argument for Defendants, as well as Defendants Brief in Reply, and Subject Matter Index
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 13
Folder 1
Show less
Show morePrinted book containing brief for appellants in United States Supreme Court case Charles F. Brush and Brush Electric Company vs. C. Harrison Condit et al., created for Brush Electric Company who were appellants, by counsel Witter and Kenyon, lower court cases taking place between 1881 and 1884, brief probably compiled in 1885
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 14
Folder 1
Show less
Show moreTwo books, printed in 1883, containing legal litigation related to Brush, et. al. versus C. Harrison Condit, et. al., taking place between 1883 and 1884 in the Circuit Court Southern District of New York. First book is Brief for Complainants, Brush Commercial Lamp, by counsel for complainant Browne and Witter. Second book is Brief for Complainants, on the Clamp Patent No. 8718, by solicitors for complainant Browne and Witter
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 13
Folder 4
Show less
Show morePrinted book containing Complainants’Record in Circuit Court of Southern District of New York for Charles F. Brush et al. versus C. Harrison Condit et al., printed in 1883 for Brush Electric Company, by counsel Browne and Witter
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 13
Folder 2
Show less
Show moreTyped book containing court transcripts for defendants in court case Charles F. Brush and The Brush Electric Company against C. Harrison Condit, Joseph Hanson and Abraham Van Winkle, doing business as Condit, Hanson, and Van Winkle
Charles F. Brush, Sr., Papers
Series 4: Litigation (1883-1906)
Box 12
Folder 4
Show less